I try to reveal the code with a hex editor, it cost me less than 3 minutes. The current version is too simple. Maybe the next version will be stronger than old one.

How about ASV?

Best regards.

Here is the link:
http://genable.com/aso/fini.html

I’ve looked at the example file provided by the firma. I’m not sure what their actual protection is supposed to be, but the trick they use to disable disassembly isn’t a very good one. They simply jump into the middle of the swf action, which happens to work in the Flash Player right now. However, there is no guarantee it will continue to work.

The topic was discussed often enough:
security through obscurity. It would take half a day to teach Flasm this particular trick. And even without that, it took me 10 minutes wiath a hex editor to reveal the code. The function in question (decompiled with Flare):

_root.onEnterFrame = function () {
  myDate = new Date();
  hourHand._rotation = myDate.getHours() * 30 + myDate.getMinutes() / 2;
  hourHandShadow._rotation = myDate.getHours() * 30 + myDate.getMinutes() / 2;
  minuteHand._rotation = myDate.getMinutes() * 6 + myDate.getSeconds() / 10;
  minuteHandShadow._rotation = myDate.getMinutes() * 6 + myDate.getSeconds() / 10;
  secondHand._rotation = myDate.getSeconds() * 6;
  secondHandShadow._rotation = myDate.getSeconds() * 6;
};

Igor
P.S. Don’t know how to preserve the formatting in your comments, sorry.

As I’ve stated in the comments at my blog at http://www.asvguy.com/2004/01/the_swf_flash_d.html we will not be jumping on bypassing this one - in line with our policy change.

Nevertheless, we will bypass it as much as we can once another decompiler does this - or in case we find it necessary.

Removing an action or changing variable function names is not reversible. But anything that crashes ASV (this one doesn’t), or makes ASV not show the correct bytecode (p-code), can be reversed, and quite easily.

So, nobody should think this kind of a protection will last forever (They state this on their site as well).

Also, there might be problems with future Flash players.

And yes, introducing itself as ‘a professional grogram’ (with a ‘g’) doesn’t make a very good first impression. (There’s no clue on where these guys are from on the site).

In any case, we will continue supporting our customers promptly, on case by case basis, with their SWF files whether protected or not.

Best regards,
Burak