Some of the big sites have embraced is as the better way to display video on their site, a way to seamlessly integrate videos without bothering with an external skin. Look at great sites like CNET and Google Video doing it. Why aren’t you, Time of India, doing it? Or are you waiting for coupla more decades to come to the trend? Why is it that, you seem to live in the pre-Firefox days?
Update
Microsoft uses Flash Video. Look at the MSN.CO.IN site on the upper left corner, they have a Flash Video of commercials at the time writing this article.
Don't like it? There are lots of published articles, pick a random one.
Brajeshwar posted this article
on Tue, Dec 13th, 2005 at 7:18 am
Categorized under Technology
Comments Post Yours
There are 6 responses so far. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
Why u so f***** obsessed with Firefox?? Nothing against it, its just u.
Lol! I just did a search for the keyword “Firefox” on my blog and I found 12 articles so far which mentioned “Firefox” in some way or the other.
We’re facing a problem where we want to do Flash Video for all of our content, but there just isn’t a simplified method of capture and encoding.
Like a software that will capture, edit and encode all in one.
The page works in firefox for me…but I am in windows. There’s a good chance it would work in firefox+linux as well, with the mplayer-mozilla plugin. but i dunno the state of media player plugins on mac.
jdgiotta, check out on2.com. They created Flash 8 format and sell their own encoders (Flix).
I agree with you .
Post yours