<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: JavaFX SDK says NO to Linux?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brajeshwar.com/2008/javafx-sdk-says-no-to-linux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brajeshwar.com/2008/javafx-sdk-says-no-to-linux/</link>
	<description>Brajeshwar is an ardent believer of KISS (Keep It Simple Stupid), he envision pushing the technical envelop time and again for the betterment of commercial and practical applications.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 20:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: commenter</title>
		<link>http://brajeshwar.com/2008/javafx-sdk-says-no-to-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-25182</link>
		<dc:creator>commenter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 16:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brajeshwar.com/?p=1048#comment-25182</guid>
		<description>Sun is putting the cart before the horse. Itâ€™s all about deployment, deployment, DEPLOYMENT!

Even if the technology is in the beta stages at the very least make the deployment as seamless or transparent to the user as possible. This is something that both Adobe and Microsoft have figured out early and quickly. But for some reason Sun seems to have itâ€™s head so far up itâ€™s butt it doesnâ€™t seem to realize it will not succeed on the desktop market if itâ€™s deployment is anything but straightforward. Security prompt dialogs? 5-10 minute downloads for a 800kb webstart demo?  I can't even get the javafx "simple video player" to run.  And you expect this technology to be used for multimedia rich sites like You Tube?  Guys you gotta stop smoking that crack and sober up, it's 2009 now.  5 years ago this would have been acceptable but come on Sun you keep hyping up these technologies yet you consistently fail to deliver.

Is it incompetence? Arrogance? Lack of Vision? Or maybe itâ€™s just lack of good leadership where sun has now inevitably slid into the abyss? Itâ€™s 2009 now and Sun has been bought out by Oracle. I would of prefered IBM but something tells me that at the very least Oracle wonâ€™t hype but actually implement technologies they are committed too whatever they may be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sun is putting the cart before the horse. It&acirc;€™s all about deployment, deployment, <span class="caps">DEPLOYMENT</span>!</p>
<p>Even if the technology is in the beta stages at the very least make the deployment as seamless or transparent to the user as possible. This is something that both Adobe and Microsoft have figured out early and quickly. But for some reason Sun seems to have it&acirc;€™s head so far up it&acirc;€™s butt it doesn&acirc;€™t seem to realize it will not succeed on the desktop market if it&acirc;€™s deployment is anything but straightforward. Security prompt dialogs? 5-10 minute downloads for a 800kb webstart demo?&#8195;I can&#8217;t even get the javafx &#8220;simple video player&#8221; to run.&#8195;And you expect this technology to be used for multimedia rich sites like You Tube?&#8195;Guys you gotta stop smoking that crack and sober up, it&#8217;s 2009 now.&#8195;5 years ago this would have been acceptable but come on Sun you keep hyping up these technologies yet you consistently fail to deliver.</p>
<p>Is it incompetence? Arrogance? Lack of Vision? Or maybe it&acirc;€™s just lack of good leadership where sun has now inevitably slid into the abyss? It&acirc;€™s 2009 now and Sun has been bought out by Oracle. I would of prefered <span class="caps">IBM </span>but something tells me that at the very least Oracle won&acirc;€™t hype but actually implement technologies they are committed too whatever they may be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jyaan</title>
		<link>http://brajeshwar.com/2008/javafx-sdk-says-no-to-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-25176</link>
		<dc:creator>jyaan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 08:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brajeshwar.com/?p=1048#comment-25176</guid>
		<description>I was really excited about JavaFX, and then really pissed when I found out there's no SDK for Linux... Seriously, what a major let down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was really excited about JavaFX, and then really pissed when I found out there&#8217;s no <span class="caps">SDK </span>for Linux&#8230; Seriously, what a major let down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed AbuBakr Mohamed</title>
		<link>http://brajeshwar.com/2008/javafx-sdk-says-no-to-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-24926</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed AbuBakr Mohamed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 02:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brajeshwar.com/?p=1048#comment-24926</guid>
		<description>"The JavaFX home page doesnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t actually use JavaFX!"

JavaFx homepage doesn't use javaFx because it's a official site for all cross platform and JavaFx doesn't support all cross platform yet. that's the idea ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The JavaFX home page doesn&Atilde;&cent;&acirc;‚&not;&acirc;„&cent;t actually use JavaFX!&#8221;</p>
<p>JavaFx homepage doesn&#8217;t use javaFx because it&#8217;s a official site for all cross platform and JavaFx doesn&#8217;t support all cross platform yet. that&#8217;s the idea ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Java Programming News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; SDK Preview for JavaFX - JavaProNews.com</title>
		<link>http://brajeshwar.com/2008/javafx-sdk-says-no-to-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-23178</link>
		<dc:creator>Java Programming News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; SDK Preview for JavaFX - JavaProNews.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 15:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brajeshwar.com/?p=1048#comment-23178</guid>
		<description>[...] Comments About The AuthorPraval Singh is a contributing writer for Brajeshwar.com. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Comments About The AuthorPraval Singh is a contributing writer for Brajeshwar.com. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
