<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Open Source Revolution &#8211; all you need to know!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brajeshwar.com/2008/open-source-revolution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brajeshwar.com/2008/open-source-revolution/</link>
	<description>Brajeshwar believes in simplicity; pushes the envelop and envisions the betterment of usable and practical solutions.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 16:44:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rajesh</title>
		<link>http://brajeshwar.com/2008/open-source-revolution/#comment-21860</link>
		<dc:creator>Rajesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 07:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brajeshwar.com/?p=830#comment-21860</guid>
		<description>FOSS or FLOSS (Free libre open source software) is always cool for individuals, small and medium business enterprises.

But bigger enterprises still go for commercial products because of the vendor commitment to support them.I believe the next logical thing that can happen (or probably should happen) will be establishment of professional support mechanisms.

Obviously support on a ongoing basis involves cost in terms of money and time(effort).so it is a good opportunity for entrepreneurs to establish fee based profession support houses for open source products.Obviously open source does not always mean free in terms of price, as is wrongly understood by many.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FOSS or FLOSS (Free libre open source software) is always cool for individuals, small and medium business enterprises.</p>
<p>But bigger enterprises still go for commercial products because of the vendor commitment to support them.I believe the next logical thing that can happen (or probably should happen) will be establishment of professional support mechanisms.</p>
<p>Obviously support on a ongoing basis involves cost in terms of money and time(effort).so it is a good opportunity for entrepreneurs to establish fee based profession support houses for open source products.Obviously open source does not always mean free in terms of price, as is wrongly understood by many.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rajesh</title>
		<link>http://brajeshwar.com/2008/open-source-revolution/#comment-29839</link>
		<dc:creator>Rajesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 07:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brajeshwar.com/?p=830#comment-29839</guid>
		<description>FOSS or FLOSS (Free libre open source software) is always cool for individuals, small and medium business enterprises.

But bigger enterprises still go for commercial products because of the vendor commitment to support them.I believe the next logical thing that can happen (or probably should happen) will be establishment of professional support mechanisms.

Obviously support on a ongoing basis involves cost in terms of money and time(effort).so it is a good opportunity for entrepreneurs to establish fee based profession support houses for open source products.Obviously open source does not always mean free in terms of price, as is wrongly understood by many.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FOSS or FLOSS (Free libre open source software) is always cool for individuals, small and medium business enterprises.</p>
<p>But bigger enterprises still go for commercial products because of the vendor commitment to support them.I believe the next logical thing that can happen (or probably should happen) will be establishment of professional support mechanisms.</p>
<p>Obviously support on a ongoing basis involves cost in terms of money and time(effort).so it is a good opportunity for entrepreneurs to establish fee based profession support houses for open source products.Obviously open source does not always mean free in terms of price, as is wrongly understood by many.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Open Source Paradigm</title>
		<link>http://brajeshwar.com/2008/open-source-revolution/#comment-21856</link>
		<dc:creator>The Open Source Paradigm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 06:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brajeshwar.com/?p=830#comment-21856</guid>
		<description>[...] been hitting on Linux HOW TO&#8217;s for quite some time now. Starting from the Open Source Revolution to LAMP and choosing a Linux distro to understanding the terminal, we&#8217;ve brushed up a lot of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] been hitting on Linux HOW TO&#8217;s for quite some time now. Starting from the Open Source Revolution to LAMP and choosing a Linux distro to understanding the terminal, we&#8217;ve brushed up a lot of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ready for LAMP? - Brajeshwar</title>
		<link>http://brajeshwar.com/2008/open-source-revolution/#comment-21578</link>
		<dc:creator>Ready for LAMP? - Brajeshwar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 05:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brajeshwar.com/?p=830#comment-21578</guid>
		<description>[...] promised about LAMP in my earlier article &#8212; The Open Source Revolution and so here am I with the details on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] promised about LAMP in my earlier article &#8212; The Open Source Revolution and so here am I with the details on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sathya</title>
		<link>http://brajeshwar.com/2008/open-source-revolution/#comment-21572</link>
		<dc:creator>Sathya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 18:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brajeshwar.com/?p=830#comment-21572</guid>
		<description>Why does the use of OSS imply that the user _must_ do changes to the code? 
I&#039;m a full-time FOSS user, I don&#039;t do the coding, though I do my bit in contributing by being active at forums and filing bug reporst. My parents and my sister use FOSS back home, I convinced them to use FOSS as it suits them just fine for their needs - browsing, wordprocessing and occasional movie/music.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does the use of OSS imply that the user _must_ do changes to the code?<br />
I'm a full-time FOSS user, I don't do the coding, though I do my bit in contributing by being active at forums and filing bug reporst. My parents and my sister use FOSS back home, I convinced them to use FOSS as it suits them just fine for their needs - browsing, wordprocessing and occasional movie/music.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sathya</title>
		<link>http://brajeshwar.com/2008/open-source-revolution/#comment-29838</link>
		<dc:creator>Sathya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 18:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brajeshwar.com/?p=830#comment-29838</guid>
		<description>Why does the use of OSS imply that the user _must_ do changes to the code? 
I&#039;m a full-time FOSS user, I don&#039;t do the coding, though I do my bit in contributing by being active at forums and filing bug reporst. My parents and my sister use FOSS back home, I convinced them to use FOSS as it suits them just fine for their needs - browsing, wordprocessing and occasional movie/music.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does the use of OSS imply that the user _must_ do changes to the code?<br />
I'm a full-time FOSS user, I don't do the coding, though I do my bit in contributing by being active at forums and filing bug reporst. My parents and my sister use FOSS back home, I convinced them to use FOSS as it suits them just fine for their needs - browsing, wordprocessing and occasional movie/music.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Praval Singh</title>
		<link>http://brajeshwar.com/2008/open-source-revolution/#comment-21570</link>
		<dc:creator>Praval Singh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 18:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brajeshwar.com/?p=830#comment-21570</guid>
		<description>I agree everyone doesn&#039;t need the source but having this option of shared source creates better avenues for developers around the world to work on it and get better products out of the current ones. It&#039;s just like you need not be a pilot to travel in an aircraft!
The concept behind open source is not new. For centuries, universities and research communities have shared their work. Monks copied books by hand. Scientists publish new discoveries in journals. Mathematical formulas are distributed, improved, redistributed.
And it&#039;s not like you should always think about open source. It&#039;s an alternative to the biased closed source. It is something that has forced big guns like Sun and Microsoft to get into open source development now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree everyone doesn't need the source but having this option of shared source creates better avenues for developers around the world to work on it and get better products out of the current ones. It's just like you need not be a pilot to travel in an aircraft!<br />
The concept behind open source is not new. For centuries, universities and research communities have shared their work. Monks copied books by hand. Scientists publish new discoveries in journals. Mathematical formulas are distributed, improved, redistributed.<br />
And it's not like you should always think about open source. It's an alternative to the biased closed source. It is something that has forced big guns like Sun and Microsoft to get into open source development now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Praval Singh</title>
		<link>http://brajeshwar.com/2008/open-source-revolution/#comment-29837</link>
		<dc:creator>Praval Singh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 18:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brajeshwar.com/?p=830#comment-29837</guid>
		<description>I agree everyone doesn&#039;t need the source but having this option of shared source creates better avenues for developers around the world to work on it and get better products out of the current ones. It&#039;s just like you need not be a pilot to travel in an aircraft!
The concept behind open source is not new. For centuries, universities and research communities have shared their work. Monks copied books by hand. Scientists publish new discoveries in journals. Mathematical formulas are distributed, improved, redistributed.
And it&#039;s not like you should always think about open source. It&#039;s an alternative to the biased closed source. It is something that has forced big guns like Sun and Microsoft to get into open source development now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree everyone doesn't need the source but having this option of shared source creates better avenues for developers around the world to work on it and get better products out of the current ones. It's just like you need not be a pilot to travel in an aircraft!<br />
The concept behind open source is not new. For centuries, universities and research communities have shared their work. Monks copied books by hand. Scientists publish new discoveries in journals. Mathematical formulas are distributed, improved, redistributed.<br />
And it's not like you should always think about open source. It's an alternative to the biased closed source. It is something that has forced big guns like Sun and Microsoft to get into open source development now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ajay</title>
		<link>http://brajeshwar.com/2008/open-source-revolution/#comment-21563</link>
		<dc:creator>ajay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 07:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brajeshwar.com/?p=830#comment-21563</guid>
		<description>how many people using open source really need sotuce code. large number of bloggers are using wp but how many of them modified the wp code.? why always think open source?
open source is complete different .
their are different thing that are involve in open source. open source is not mean that it is free</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how many people using open source really need sotuce code. large number of bloggers are using wp but how many of them modified the wp code.? why always think open source?<br />
open source is complete different .<br />
their are different thing that are involve in open source. open source is not mean that it is free</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ajay</title>
		<link>http://brajeshwar.com/2008/open-source-revolution/#comment-29836</link>
		<dc:creator>ajay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 07:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brajeshwar.com/?p=830#comment-29836</guid>
		<description>how many people using open source really need sotuce code. large number of bloggers are using wp but how many of them modified the wp code.? why always think open source?
open source is complete different .
their are different thing that are involve in open source. open source is not mean that it is free</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how many people using open source really need sotuce code. large number of bloggers are using wp but how many of them modified the wp code.? why always think open source?<br />
open source is complete different .<br />
their are different thing that are involve in open source. open source is not mean that it is free</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached

Served from: brajeshwar.com @ 2012-05-24 10:06:12 -->
