Comments on: Software installation woes on Linux

By: Sathya

Sathya — Thu, 03 Jul 2008 15:17:55 +0000

I believe you first said "architecture behind the vista is simply gr8 as compare to linux " now, you're telling "i have never said windows has a superior architecture then Linux". If you have a point, stick to it, and give credible references while at it. Coming to the point of Vista, I haven't used it, I can't comment on it. Some of my friends have used it, half of them didn't have any problems, the remaining had hell loads of problems

By: Sathya

Sathya — Thu, 03 Jul 2008 15:17:00 +0000

By: ajay pathak

ajay pathak — Thu, 03 Jul 2008 14:01:55 +0000

and what this Bad Vista showing to operating system users . is vista is really bad or just a hype created.
can you put some points on this

By: ajay pathak

ajay pathak — Thu, 03 Jul 2008 14:01:00 +0000

and what this Bad Vista showing to operating system users . is vista is really bad or just a hype created.
can you put some points on this

By: ajay pathak

ajay pathak — Thu, 03 Jul 2008 14:00:40 +0000

there is nothing 100% in this world but most of the time people say that vista is very bad and many other things about this.
i have never said windows has a superior architecture then Linux but Windows Vista has best architecture as compare to any other version of windows operating system.

By: ajay pathak

ajay pathak — Thu, 03 Jul 2008 14:00:00 +0000

By: Sathya

Sathya — Thu, 03 Jul 2008 12:26:39 +0000

@Ajay
First,

There is only one problem Vista has is that it launch year 2007

I'm sorry this makes no sense to me at all.
And yes I did check up your latest post, there's nothing in the post to state that "Windows has a superior architecture". If you're mentioning about kernel having different subsystems then you *should* research because Linux has had the concept of dynamically loading/unloading kernel modules since its inception.

And yes as Praval mentioned, I don't see why people have to go saying this is better and that is bad. Use what you like.

By: Sathya

Sathya — Thu, 03 Jul 2008 12:26:00 +0000

@Ajay
First,

There is only one problem Vista has is that it launch year 2007

I'm sorry this makes no sense to me at all.
And yes I did check up your latest post, there's nothing in the post to state that "Windows has a superior architecture". If you're mentioning about kernel having different subsystems then you *should* research because Linux has had the concept of dynamically loading/unloading kernel modules since its inception.

And yes as Praval mentioned, I don't see why people have to go saying this is better and that is bad. Use what you like.

By: Praval Singh

Praval Singh — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 02:53:01 +0000

Hi all! Sorry, but i kept a bit busy with work all of the last week. As a result, I couldn't get to the comments. I am overwhelmed with the kind of response you guys have shown!

@ Ajay: I guess Sathya has has quoted my thoughts in a lesser number of words than one could could have! Rather than getting biased about a technology and referring it as good or bad, we must look at its greener side and learn out of it.
Talking about security, most of the websites are still hosted on Linux servers, so would that mean they aren't secure?
I would not like to comment anything on the vista architecture without knowing how much can you actually understand about operating system architecture and design.

By: Praval Singh

Praval Singh — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 02:53:00 +0000

Hi all! Sorry, but i kept a bit busy with work all of the last week. As a result, I couldn't get to the comments. I am overwhelmed with the kind of response you guys have shown!