<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The magic of Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brajeshwar.com/2009/the-magic-of-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brajeshwar.com/2009/the-magic-of-google/</link>
	<description>Brajeshwar believes in simplicity; pushes the envelop and envisions the betterment of usable and practical solutions.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 16:44:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Himanshu</title>
		<link>http://brajeshwar.com/2009/the-magic-of-google/#comment-25449</link>
		<dc:creator>Himanshu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 18:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brajeshwar.com/?p=1960#comment-25449</guid>
		<description>There are total more than 75 Google services present and Google is adding more services in its magic box, everyone waiting for incredible Google wave service which is online communication and collaboration tool. Also recently Google image service includes image search having tag of commercial reuse with modification which is very useful for bloggers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are total more than 75 Google services present and Google is adding more services in its magic box, everyone waiting for incredible Google wave service which is online communication and collaboration tool. Also recently Google image service includes image search having tag of commercial reuse with modification which is very useful for bloggers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Himanshu</title>
		<link>http://brajeshwar.com/2009/the-magic-of-google/#comment-30387</link>
		<dc:creator>Himanshu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 18:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brajeshwar.com/?p=1960#comment-30387</guid>
		<description>There are total more than 75 Google services present and Google is adding more services in its magic box, everyone waiting for incredible Google wave service which is online communication and collaboration tool. Also recently Google image service includes image search having tag of commercial reuse with modification which is very useful for bloggers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are total more than 75 Google services present and Google is adding more services in its magic box, everyone waiting for incredible Google wave service which is online communication and collaboration tool. Also recently Google image service includes image search having tag of commercial reuse with modification which is very useful for bloggers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Praval Singh</title>
		<link>http://brajeshwar.com/2009/the-magic-of-google/#comment-25410</link>
		<dc:creator>Praval Singh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 05:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brajeshwar.com/?p=1960#comment-25410</guid>
		<description>I would want visitors to use their own names while pushing comments and not mine!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would want visitors to use their own names while pushing comments and not mine!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Praval Singh</title>
		<link>http://brajeshwar.com/2009/the-magic-of-google/#comment-30386</link>
		<dc:creator>Praval Singh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 05:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brajeshwar.com/?p=1960#comment-30386</guid>
		<description>I would want visitors to use their own names while pushing comments and not mine!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would want visitors to use their own names while pushing comments and not mine!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Praval Singh</title>
		<link>http://brajeshwar.com/2009/the-magic-of-google/#comment-25403</link>
		<dc:creator>Praval Singh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 09:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brajeshwar.com/?p=1960#comment-25403</guid>
		<description>@Vinod: Thanks for pointing out Vinod. Last month, Google CEO Eric Schmidt however said - &quot;What we said is we believe YouTube will eventually be a successful and a profitable business and it will take some time to do it,&quot;.

They&#039;re not going to get it into drains just like several other products did. (Check out the post for the link).

Good to see your insights on th epost. Keep them  coming!
							Sorry... forgot to say great post - can&#039;t wait to read your next one!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Vinod: Thanks for pointing out Vinod. Last month, Google CEO Eric Schmidt however said - "What we said is we believe YouTube will eventually be a successful and a profitable business and it will take some time to do it,".</p>
<p>They're not going to get it into drains just like several other products did. (Check out the post for the link).</p>
<p>Good to see your insights on th epost. Keep them  coming!<br />
							Sorry... forgot to say great post - can't wait to read your next one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Praval Singh</title>
		<link>http://brajeshwar.com/2009/the-magic-of-google/#comment-30385</link>
		<dc:creator>Praval Singh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 09:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brajeshwar.com/?p=1960#comment-30385</guid>
		<description>@Vinod: Thanks for pointing out Vinod. Last month, Google CEO Eric Schmidt however said - &quot;What we said is we believe YouTube will eventually be a successful and a profitable business and it will take some time to do it,&quot;.

They&#039;re not going to get it into drains just like several other products did. (Check out the post for the link).

Good to see your insights on th epost. Keep them  coming!
							Sorry... forgot to say great post - can&#039;t wait to read your next one!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Vinod: Thanks for pointing out Vinod. Last month, Google CEO Eric Schmidt however said - "What we said is we believe YouTube will eventually be a successful and a profitable business and it will take some time to do it,".</p>
<p>They're not going to get it into drains just like several other products did. (Check out the post for the link).</p>
<p>Good to see your insights on th epost. Keep them  coming!<br />
							Sorry... forgot to say great post - can't wait to read your next one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Praval Singh</title>
		<link>http://brajeshwar.com/2009/the-magic-of-google/#comment-25400</link>
		<dc:creator>Praval Singh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 06:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brajeshwar.com/?p=1960#comment-25400</guid>
		<description>@Vinod: Thanks for pointing out Vinod. Last month, Google CEO Eric Schmidt however said - &quot;What we said is we believe YouTube will eventually be a successful and a profitable business and it will take some time to do it,&quot;.

They&#039;re not going to get it into drains just like several other products did. (Check out the post for the link).

Good to see your insights on th epost. Keep them  coming!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Vinod: Thanks for pointing out Vinod. Last month, Google CEO Eric Schmidt however said - "What we said is we believe YouTube will eventually be a successful and a profitable business and it will take some time to do it,".</p>
<p>They're not going to get it into drains just like several other products did. (Check out the post for the link).</p>
<p>Good to see your insights on th epost. Keep them  coming!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Praval Singh</title>
		<link>http://brajeshwar.com/2009/the-magic-of-google/#comment-30384</link>
		<dc:creator>Praval Singh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 06:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brajeshwar.com/?p=1960#comment-30384</guid>
		<description>@Vinod: Thanks for pointing out Vinod. Last month, Google CEO Eric Schmidt however said - &quot;What we said is we believe YouTube will eventually be a successful and a profitable business and it will take some time to do it,&quot;.

They&#039;re not going to get it into drains just like several other products did. (Check out the post for the link).

Good to see your insights on th epost. Keep them  coming!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Vinod: Thanks for pointing out Vinod. Last month, Google CEO Eric Schmidt however said - "What we said is we believe YouTube will eventually be a successful and a profitable business and it will take some time to do it,".</p>
<p>They're not going to get it into drains just like several other products did. (Check out the post for the link).</p>
<p>Good to see your insights on th epost. Keep them  coming!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vinod</title>
		<link>http://brajeshwar.com/2009/the-magic-of-google/#comment-25399</link>
		<dc:creator>Vinod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 22:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brajeshwar.com/?p=1960#comment-25399</guid>
		<description>&quot;YouTube was a yet another profitable buy by Google.&quot;

I beg to differ. Google themselves admit they are yet to break-even from this deal. FYI -

http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSN3052022220080430

AND an excerpt from The Guardian:

&quot;An oft-quoted 20 hours of video is uploaded to YouTube every minute - a popularity that Credit Suisse estimated to represent a $380m cost to Google for 2009 to cover bandwidth, data centres, software and hardware. RampRate put it at more like $83m, citing wholesale broadband deals and proprietary Google technology that would save them cash.

Google has confirmed before that YouTube isn&#039;t profitable, but never given the extent of the loss. Taking the highest estimate for YouTube&#039;s revenues and lowest estimate of running costs, YouTube could actually be just about breaking even.&quot;

Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"YouTube was a yet another profitable buy by Google."</p>
<p>I beg to differ. Google themselves admit they are yet to break-even from this deal. FYI -</p>
<p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSN3052022220080430" rel="nofollow">http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSN3052022220080430</a></p>
<p>AND an excerpt from The Guardian:</p>
<p>"An oft-quoted 20 hours of video is uploaded to YouTube every minute - a popularity that Credit Suisse estimated to represent a $380m cost to Google for 2009 to cover bandwidth, data centres, software and hardware. RampRate put it at more like $83m, citing wholesale broadband deals and proprietary Google technology that would save them cash.</p>
<p>Google has confirmed before that YouTube isn't profitable, but never given the extent of the loss. Taking the highest estimate for YouTube's revenues and lowest estimate of running costs, YouTube could actually be just about breaking even."</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vinod</title>
		<link>http://brajeshwar.com/2009/the-magic-of-google/#comment-30383</link>
		<dc:creator>Vinod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 22:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brajeshwar.com/?p=1960#comment-30383</guid>
		<description>&quot;YouTube was a yet another profitable buy by Google.&quot;

I beg to differ. Google themselves admit they are yet to break-even from this deal. FYI -

http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSN3052022220080430

AND an excerpt from The Guardian:

&quot;An oft-quoted 20 hours of video is uploaded to YouTube every minute - a popularity that Credit Suisse estimated to represent a $380m cost to Google for 2009 to cover bandwidth, data centres, software and hardware. RampRate put it at more like $83m, citing wholesale broadband deals and proprietary Google technology that would save them cash.

Google has confirmed before that YouTube isn&#039;t profitable, but never given the extent of the loss. Taking the highest estimate for YouTube&#039;s revenues and lowest estimate of running costs, YouTube could actually be just about breaking even.&quot;

Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"YouTube was a yet another profitable buy by Google."</p>
<p>I beg to differ. Google themselves admit they are yet to break-even from this deal. FYI -</p>
<p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSN3052022220080430" rel="nofollow">http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSN3052022220080430</a></p>
<p>AND an excerpt from The Guardian:</p>
<p>"An oft-quoted 20 hours of video is uploaded to YouTube every minute - a popularity that Credit Suisse estimated to represent a $380m cost to Google for 2009 to cover bandwidth, data centres, software and hardware. RampRate put it at more like $83m, citing wholesale broadband deals and proprietary Google technology that would save them cash.</p>
<p>Google has confirmed before that YouTube isn't profitable, but never given the extent of the loss. Taking the highest estimate for YouTube's revenues and lowest estimate of running costs, YouTube could actually be just about breaking even."</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached

Served from: brajeshwar.com @ 2012-05-24 12:22:02 -->
