in Technology

Copyright Infringement Case – Oracle vs Google

Oracle is seeking hefty damages “in billions of dollars” from Google Inc. over the patent lawsuit, according to the court filing. Oracle had sued Google last year, claiming that Google’s Android operating system has violated Oracle’s Java patents. Oracle is also pursuing to stop further sales of these Android products and quoted that it was willful and deliberate infringement of seven of their patents and copyrights related to Java Technologies which they acquired from SUN Microsystems in January 2010. Oracle also alleged that the Android platform has explicitly copied elements of Oracle’s patented Java’s API packages.

In a document filed in court by Oracle few days back, Oracle accused the web search company of trying to conceal the fact that Oracle’s damage claims in this case were in the billions though Google has denied any of these wrongdoings. Oracle has asked the court to make some of the information public. Google representatives did not immediately respond for any request to comment. This legal battle has taken people by surprise and has caused a rift between CEOs Larry Ellison and Eric Schmidt. When Schmidt was working for Sun, the company developed thousands of patents of freely shared technologies and became its firm supporter. They started offering versions of its Java under open source licenses. Schmidt joined Google and brought that philosophy to the web search company assuming to have rights to use Java and never announced the licensing deal.

Google’s chief Larry Page made the decision to acquire Android Inc. and thereby launch and develop the platform that Oracle now contends of infringement of its copyrighted patents. Oracle also wants to depose three more people apart from the previous ten allowed in the court, according to the filing. They include former Google employees Dipchand Nishar, Bob Lee and the Android engineer Tim Lindholm. Google has criticized Oracle’s demands quoting that the case’s first deposition did not take place until April this year and at the end of the case’s discovery period, Oracle wants to cram more and more people. Google’s attorneys said that there was no need to depose Larry Page and doing so would only mean harassing the most senior executive of a company of such stature paving way to redundant testimony to Google.

Google also made a filing earlier this week in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Google’s attorney has petitioned to eliminate the damage estimates calculated by Oracle.A pivotal hearing in this case is said to be set for July 21. Judge William Alsup has asked both the sides to give their opinions on whether the case should be stayed pending a number of re-examinations of Oracle’s patents. He also said that it appears possible that Google might know Android infringing Oracle’s patents. Abandoning the negotiations to obtain a license for Android with Sun Microsystems (before Oracle acquiring Sun) has proved it as one of the most unpleasant inaccuracies in a 13-year history of Google.

Google will be in big trouble if Oracle manages to win. If Google is forced to pay a royalty and compensate past damages, it would be a whooping figure of $2.6 Billion as Oracle has cited in one of the reports. And who knows, Android might not be able to stay free too.

  1. As Android dominates mobile communications independently in mobile and compact gadgets, Java will somewhat become obsolete and dies with its gadgets. Both Java and Android acts as operating system and applications for mobile devices. Java, of course, will never die on the web. 
    Google provided us free services (so as Yahoo) in our search routines, and also maps (google earth) which really had helped a lot of internet users. Java had provided us also services to our daily lives (lots of it) which we really don't know how.
    ANY WORK (ART, STORIES, LETTERS, ETC...) YOU HAD IS YOUR WORK (YOU AS EXCLUSIVE OWNER) AND CAN BE COPYRIGHTED, IF AND ONLY IF IT IS ORIGINAL AND NO ONE HAS ACQUIRED/USED OR MADE IT BEFORE YOU.
    IF SOMEONE USES IT, VIOLATES YOUR RIGHT, SPECIALLY IF THE ONE WHO COPIES/USES IT IS EARNING MONEY OUT OF YOUR WORK. YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO SUE HIM/HER IF YOU HAVE COPYRIGHTED YOUR WORK or you had evidence for it.
    HOPE ORACLE AND GOOGLE HELP EACH OTHER TO PROVIDE THE PEOPLE OF THE WORLD, FREE SERVICES. THANK YOU ORACLE for JAVA (and other applications) and THANK YOU GOOGLE for GMAIL, GoogleEarth, Android...

  2. Your title is misleading. Patent infringement is different from copyright infringement- just as it is different from Trademark or Trade Secret infringement.

  3. Herewith is the article... "Oracle is also pursuing to stop further sales of these Android products
    and quoted that it was willful and deliberate infringement of seven of
    their patents and copyrights related to Java Technologies which they
    acquired from SUN Microsystems in January
    2010. Oracle also alleged that the Android platform has explicitly
    copied elements of Oracle’s patented Java’s API packages". The article says ...infringement of seven of their patents and copyright related to Java Technologies..., means it imploring to both. Please read thoroughly so you will not ask questions which is answerable by the article itself.

    I used the word copyright infringement (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_infringement) because Android software (android-operating system) is copyrightable. And because software (Android) is copyrightable, therefore, it can have rights for its derivatives (versions) and other reproductions. copyrightable materials are newspaper, stories, songs, music, artworks, etc..., that can be copied or reproduced on a media.

    If it is patent infringement (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patent_infringement), then, Google had copied an invention (patent) of Oracle, and when that invention dies, the product/hardware die also, which means that the right is solely for the invention (patent) only. An invention may be a material, hardware, tools, etc..., which you can use for a specific purpose, use or application.

    Lets make it easier to understand. For example, we had a patented cellphone Sony Ericsson W300i that uses a version of Java (operating system) for it. When the cellphone dies (broken), the right for that version of Java dies with the machine it designed to work on.

    Another example is an operating system of Microsoft, Windows XP. It is sold separately (license to use) and it should be installed in order for PC to run. XP is copyrighted and usually comes with single (1) license exclusively for use on one (1) PC. The XP, as long as there are stocks, will continue to be sold even when Microsoft ends its support. When the PC dies, Microsoft remains the owner of XP's copyright.

    Patent and copyright are different. Android is software, that is why I use the word copyright because it is copyrightable. Have you seen any hardware/product copied by Google from Oracle in the article? READ FURTHER... YOU WILL FIND NOTHING!

    IF YOU HAD UNDERSTAND MY FIRST COMMENT, IT HAD ANSWERED AND EXPLAINED YOUR QUESTION. IF YOU STILL DON'T UNDERSTAND THIS, YOU GO TO http://www.copyright.gov/ or call (202) 707-5959 or 1-877-476-0778 (toll free) and ask/inquire for it.

Comments are closed.